[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101209192050.GA26457@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:20:50 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu, sandeen@...hat.com, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
hch@...radead.org, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2 v1] Ioctl for reading block queue information
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 04:25:35PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For a long time it has been pretty painful to retrieve informations from
> /sys/block/*/queue for particular block device. Not only it is painful
> to retrieve informations within C tool, parsing strings, etc, but one
> have to run into problem even finding the proper path in sysfs.
What's wrong with using libudev? That should give you all of this
information easily using a .c program without any need to change the
kernel at all.
> This patch set adds new block ioctl BLKGETQUEUEINFO, which is designed to
> retrieve particular block queue attributes. I have tried to not to
> create completely new interface, but since we already have those
> information within block queue sysfs kobjects, rather retrieve it from
> there.
Ick, no, please just use the sysfs files, don't create a new ioctl, they
are horrid.
>
> So it binds enum blkq_info_type in include/linux/fs.h with
> default_attrs[] definition within block/blk-sysfs.c for ordering
> purposes, so the userspace has reliable way to address specific
> block queue attribute.
>
> In order to avoid string parsing (given that 99% of block queue sysfs
> attributes are of unsigned long type) I have introduced new sysfs_ops
> member *get which may be used to pass pointer to any type of data (unsigned
> long in this case). Then this get method is used to withdraw information
> through kobject->ktype->sysfs_ops.
>
> Although there are some downsides of this approach I would like to discuss:
>
> 1. In current state BLKGETQUEUEINFO and the whole infrastructure allow to
> retrieve only numeric values (no text), this means we are no able to
> retrieve schedule information.
>
> 2. Adding new *get member into sysfs_ops. I see this as the most painful
> downside, however, when we have more subsystems adding ioctls like this,
> they can easily use this method, the same way I am using it now.
Nope, don't do this, just use sysfs how it is supposed to be used, from
userspace.
sorry,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists