linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3 v3] perf: Implement Nehalem uncore pmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTi=GeCHZ23J5UDoUfbWnLHfVWCeA7f9Gh_sKYSqa@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:15:19 +0100
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3 v3] perf: Implement Nehalem uncore pmu

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:20 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
>> +       /* Check CPUID signatures: 06_1AH, 06_1EH, 06_1FH */
>> +       family = boot_cpu_data.x86;
>> +       model = boot_cpu_data.x86_model;
>> +       if (family != 6 || (model != 0x1A && model != 0x1E && model != 0x1F))
>> +               return;
>
> So that's 26, 30 and 31? Curiously
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c does have 31.
>
It is also missing model 44 (0x2c).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/