[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D01462A.4010808@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:12:10 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix when booting Xen+Linux under QEMU.
On 12/09/2010 01:01 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Please take a look. The first patch just cleans up the find_unbound_irq
> so it is easier to understand what it does.
>
> The second patch hardness the Xen IRQ (event channels) allocation finder
> if you try to boot a minimalistic 32-bit Linux kernel along with a
> Xen hypervisor under QEMU.
>
> We end up with a weird scenario where the nr_irq_gsi was greater than nr_irq
> by 16. This code hardness it by pointing out the issue to the user and tries
> to continue - BUT this might impact the PCI device allocation.
>
> Tested also on normal machine with no regressions found.
I think I'd prefer to:
1. move to using all dynamic irqs, and use the core kernel irq
allocator (ie, resurrect IanC's patches)
2. kill the ioapic dummy page hack (I'm assuming that would be
trivial - at least to make it all zero - because the kernel won't
care about the number of GSIs at that point)
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists