[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1012092244520.2653@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:49:02 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com, penberg@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] x86: Unify CPU -> NUMA node mapping between 32
and 64bit
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Unlike 64bit, 32bit has been using its own cpu_to_node_map[] for CPU
> -> NUMA node mapping. Replace it with early_percpu variable
> x86_cpu_to_node_map and share the mapping code with 64bit.
>
> * USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID is now enabled for 32bit too.
>
> * x86_cpu_to_node_map and numa_set/clear_node() are moved from numa_64
> to numa. For now, x86_cpu_to_node_map is initialized with 0 instead
> of NUMA_NO_NODE. This is to avoid introducing unexpected behavior
That's true for 32bit only, right? I actually had to dig into the code
to verify this. Please make this clear for the casual reader.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists