[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=PnnT8rVKMxK0tVTdKnKdcKf71fsX2o594Qx3e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:00:12 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
dwalker@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...vell.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@...eaurora.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: move consistent_init to early_initcall
On 10 December 2010 00:58, Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 01:23:24AM -0800, skannan@...eaurora.org wrote:
>>>
>>> Russell, Have you had a chance to look at this? Any comments? How do we
>>> move ahead?
>>
>> I had connected the other thread with this one - it's pretty hard not
>> to as it included this patch in that set as the first patch.
>
> Ok. So what's your take on handling the cache coherency with secure domain?
> Do we get to add cache invalidate APIs outside of DMA APIs?
Can the secure software not create NS pages and be fully coherent?
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists