[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D020B22.1030701@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:12:34 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com, penberg@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] x86: Remove custom apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid()
implementations
Hello, Thomas.
On 12/09/2010 10:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> After the previous patch, apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() is no longer
>> used. The callback will be repurposed. Remove all the custom
>
> That's a very bad idea. You remove the callbacks from the esoteric
> platforms, but you keep the other implementation in the tree.
>
> It's not longer used now, so remove all incarnations and get rid of
> all those useless = NULL initializations at the same time. Then
> implement a new callback with a different name.
Yeah, that would be cleaner. I wasn't very sure about clearing
unimplemented apic ops. Currently the rule seems to be always setting
them to NULL and I didn't want to re-do that with a new callback.
> It's slightly more work and code churn, but it makes the change
> entirely clear. It'd be also nice to annotate in the function name
> that this is 32bit only or even make it 32bit dependent if it's not
> too much ifdeffery
Yeah, sure, if the silly NULL assignments aren't necessary, I don't
think it would be much more churn anyway.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists