[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101210151135.GA7695@lenovo>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:11:35 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3 v3] perf: Implement Nehalem uncore pmu
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:52:15AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 11:47 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 00:46 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > So I have tested this patch a bit on WSM and as I expected there
> > > are issues with sampling.
> > >
> > > When HT is on, both siblings CPUs get the interrupt. The HW does not
> > > allow you to only point interrupts to a single HT thread (CPU).
> >
> > Egads, how ugly :/
> >
crap...
...
>
> That would of course need to also grow some smarts to detect if there is
> only 1 sibling online.
>
> CC'ed Cyrill as P4 might have something similar.
>
Yes, Don was testing p4 stuff for me and have reported this issue as well.
I'll check what I can do. Thanks for CC'ing me.
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists