[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101210133212.70844480.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:32:12 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c between commit
5f2b0ba4d94b3ac23cbc4b7f675d98eb677a760a ("x86, nmi_watchdog: Remove the
old nmi_watchdog") from the tip tree and commits
aa0be2afeed15edd653830ca87a3f173f08c23e6 ("x86: Use this_cpu_ops to
optimize code") and e5195e91d9b579ba9def00ea2e8b96189c0120f4 ("x86: Use
this_cpu_inc_return for nmi counter") from the percpu tree.
I just ignored the percpu changes to this file and removed it as the tip
tree did.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists