[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012101529190.30039@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:30:38 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [7/7,v8] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Implement per-node add_memory
debugfs interface
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Shaohui Zheng wrote:
> > That doesn't address the question. My question is whether or not adding
> > memory to a memoryless node in this way transitions its state to
> > N_HIGH_MEMORY in the VM?
> I guess that you are talking about memory hotplug on x86_32, memory hotplug is
> NOT supported well for x86_32, and the function add_memory does not consider
> this situlation.
>
> For 64bit, N_HIGH_MEMORY == N_NORMAL_MEMORY, so we need not to do the transition.
>
One more time :) Memoryless nodes do not have their bit set in
N_HIGH_MEMORY. When memory is added to a memoryless node with this new
interface, does the bit get set?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists