lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101209223210.acd540de.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:32:10 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] kthread: NUMA aware kthread_create_on_cpu()

On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:59:58 +0100 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:

> Le jeudi 09 d__cembre 2010 __ 16:44 -0800, Andrew Morton a __crit :
> 
> > The name "kthread_create_on_cpu" is pretty misleading.
> > 
> > One would expect such a function to create a kthread which is bound to
> > that CPU.  But what it in fact does is to create a kthread which is
> > bound to all CPUs and whose stack, task_struct and thread_info were
> > allocated from the node which contains `cpu'.
> > 
> > Also, a saner interface would be one which takes the numa_node_id, not
> > the cpu number.
> > 
> 
> 
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > >  /**
> > > - * kthread_create - create a kthread.
> > > + * kthread_create_on_cpu - create a kthread.
> > >   * @threadfn: the function to run until signal_pending(current).
> > >   * @data: data ptr for @threadfn.
> > > + * @cpu: cpu number.
> > >   * @namefmt: printf-style name for the thread.
> > >   *
> > >   * Description: This helper function creates and names a kernel
> > >   * thread.  The thread will be stopped: use wake_up_process() to start
> > >   * it.  See also kthread_run().
> > >   *
> > > + * If thread is going to be bound on a particular cpu, give its number
> > > + * in @cpu, to get NUMA affinity for kthread stack, or else give -1.
> > 
> > This is a bit presumptuous.  The caller might wish to later bind this
> > thread to some or all of the CPUs on the node, rather than to a single
> > CPU (eg, kswapd()).
> > 
> > 
> > So what to do?  Maybe add a new kthread_create_node() which prepares a
> > kthread whose memory is bound to that node, then add a
> > kthread_create_cpu() convenience wrapper around that?
> > 
> 
> We probably can add the "bind to cpu" as a fifth patch, to avoid one 
> kthread_bind(p, cpu);  done by these callers.
> 
> My reasoning not including this kthread_bind(p, cpu) in initial patch
> series that I was focusing on NUMA properties first, not on scheduling
> (this part already runs correctly as far as I know)
> 
> Thanks for taking the patch series, I was about to resubmit it today :)
> 

but but but.  The name "kthread_create_on_cpu" sucks.  It's plain wrong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ