[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1012102116540.10437@xanadu.home>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:23:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> OK, so here's the latest version, using fancy __this_cpu thingies.
>
> I started a new thread since the old one was quite unwieldy.
>
> Now, admittedly this patch is a tad large, esp for -rc5. So either we
> need lots of Reviewed-by and such or I need to shrink this patch
> somehow.
>
>
> ---
> Subject: sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Date: Thu Dec 09 14:15:34 CET 2010
>
> ARM systems have a 32bit sched_clock() [ which needs to be fixed ],
> but this exposed a bug in the irq_time code as well, it doesn't deal
> with wraps at all.
[...]
That would be more close to reality if you stated "Some ARM systems have
a 32bit sched_clock() [" above. Most ARM systems in use today have a
sched_clock() with more than 32 bits, like 55 bits or so.
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists