linux-kernel - Re: Change-Id's

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1292110858.4234.806.camel@m0nster>
Date:	Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:40:58 -0800
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Change-Id's

On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 14:23 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2010 7:45 AM, "Daniel Walker" <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > How do people feel about Change-Id's at the end of commit messages?
> 
> In general, I think the rule should be that tags are ok as long as
> they are useful for EVERYBODY. if it's some internal company tag,
> expect people to complain. If it doesn't have meaning to others, why
> should it be in the public tree?

Ok .. I couldn't agree with you more.

> If you have some internal tracking thing, just associate the commit
> ids (or " patch ids") with your internal tracker - don't make anybody
> else have to look at crud that gas no meaning to them.
> 
> (Sent from my phone so this probably has HTML crud and gets bounced
> from the mailing lists)

Hopefully my reply doesn't get bounced ..

Daniel

-- 
Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/