[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:34:05 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Adam Belay <abelay@....edu>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>, rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] resources: add arch hook for preventing allocation in
reserved areas
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks, I'll add Dan and Rafael's tested-bys to the patches (they're
> already in my for-linus tree). Unless Linus has a problem with them
> I'll send them over to him this weekend or Monday.
See my other email I just sent out.
I really am not going to take some totally new experimental and hacky
major PCI resource management thing this late in the -rc game. No way,
no how.
If the top-down allocator is causing regressions that cannot be fixed
by _simple_ patches, we're simply going to have to undo it. What's the
advantage of top-down? None. Not if we then need all this crap, which
we could as easily do on top of the bottom-up one WITHOUT any
regressions.
Why isn't anybody else questioning the whole basic premise here?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists