[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101213002138.GA5164@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:21:38 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Make sure the FADT is at least rev 2 before
using the reset register
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 08:16:36AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 01:57 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > The reset register was only introduced with version 2 of the FADT, so we
> > should check that the FADT revision before trusting its contents.
> >
> does the current code break anything?
> I'm curious about how you found this bug. :)
No, it just seems to be a sensible sanity check.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists