linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/46] fs: dcache scale hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101213050558.GA8624@amd>
Date:	Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:05:58 +1100
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/46] fs: dcache scale hash

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 08:01:26PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > I would prefer more in-depth review than from someone who doesn't know
> > d_lock protects d_flags,
> 
> Your implication about my competence is incorrect and entirely
> inappropriate.  Ad hominen attacks don't improve your argument or
> encourage other people to review your code.

I'll also just add that if you don't like ad-hominen attacks, you
shouldn't have made implications about my integrity and honesty by
accusing me of wanting a rubber stamp, rather than a real review.
Which was before I suggested that you were confused about d_flags
locking, you'll note.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/