linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [104/223] KVM: Write protect memory after slot swap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:20:46 +0100
From:	Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, mst@...hat.com, gregkh@...e.de,
	ak@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [104/223] KVM: Write protect memory after slot swap

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
>> But all the patches tagged for -stable are supposed to be already
>> upstream and therefore well tested.
>> What am I missing?
>
> They were tested upstream on the upstream code base.  That says nothing
> about 2.6.35 (well, it says something, but not as much as "2.6.35 with the
> patch managed to install and run various tests with several Linux and
> Windows guests, and did not cause regressions in the unit test suite").

Sure, makes lot of sense. Thanks for the clarification.

Regards,
-- 
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/