linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ata: pata_at91.c bugfix for high master clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:02:36 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To:	plyatov@...il.com
CC:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	geomatsi@...il.com, nicolas.ferre@...el.com, linux@...im.org.za,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	christian.glindkamp@...kit.de, ryan@...ewatersys.com,
	pgsellmann@...tner-elektronik.at
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ata: pata_at91.c bugfix for high master clock

Hello.

On 12-12-2010 22:02, Igor Plyatov wrote:

>>> The AT91SAM9 microcontrollers with master clock higher then 105 MHz
>>> and PIO0, have overflow of the NCS_RD_PULSE value in the MSB. This
>>> lead to "NCS_RD_PULSE" pulse longer then "NRD_CYCLE" pulse and driver
>>> does not detect ATA device.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Igor Plyatov<plyatov@...il.com>
>> [...]

> Please use more descriptive comments, because it is not clear what you
> mean here. Maybe here you just cut a text...

    Exactly, this is how I mark the cut out text.

> It is so strange to cut such small amount of text and I does not have
> any idea why here is "[...]" exists.

    Well, it's still better than leaving large patches quoted and uncommented, 
having only one comment at the top, as some people do. :-)

>>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
>>> index 0da0dcc..a462405 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
>> [...]

> The same as above. Nobody are able to read you mind on the distance :-)

    It's the first time anybody tried to iterpret my [...] marks as comments. :-)

>>> @@ -50,7 +52,7 @@ struct at91_ide_info {
>>>    };
>>>
>>>    static const struct ata_timing initial_timing =
>>> -	{XFER_PIO_0, 70, 290, 240, 600, 165, 150, 600, 0};
>>> +	{XFER_PIO_0, 70, 290, 240, 600, 165, 150, 0, 600, 0};

>>      BTW, you haven't described this in the changelog...

> Here is just a typo fixed for the ata_timing structure. This typo does
> not have influence on the driver operation, but I do not like to leave
> such a negligible problem as it is.

   You at least should have noted that in the changelog. And as the change is 
unrelated to the other changes you're doing, it's a good practice to put it 
into a separate patch.

>> WBR, Sergei

> Best regards!
> --
> Igor Plyatov

WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/