linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D060A31.3030606@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:57:37 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting

On 12/11/2010 03:57 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Avi Kivity<avi@...hat.com>  [2010-12-11 09:31:24]:
>
> >  On 12/10/2010 07:03 AM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> >  >>
> >  >>   Scheduler people, please flame me with anything I may have done
> >  >>   wrong, so I can do it right for a next version :)
> >  >>
> >  >
> >  >This is a good problem statement, there are other things to consider
> >  >as well
> >  >
> >  >1. If a hard limit feature is enabled underneath, donating the
> >  >timeslice would probably not make too much sense in that case
> >
> >  What's the alternative?
> >
> >  Consider a two vcpu guest with a 50% hard cap.  Suppose the workload
> >  involves ping-ponging within the guest.  If the scheduler decides to
> >  schedule the vcpus without any overlap, then the throughput will be
> >  dictated by the time slice.  If we allow donation, throughput is
> >  limited by context switch latency.
> >
>
> If the vpcu holding the lock runs more and capped, the timeslice
> transfer is a heuristic that will not help.

Why not?  as long as we shift the cap as well.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/