[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1292243894.6803.201.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:38:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/47] IO-less dirty throttling v3
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 19:49 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > Reviewing is lots easier if the patches present logical steps. The
> > presented series will have us looking back and forth, review patch, find
> > bugs, then scan fwd to see if the bug has been solved, etc..
>
> Good suggestion. Sorry I did have the plan to fold them at some later
> time. I'll do a new version to fold the patches 16-25. 26-31 will be
> retained since they are logical enhancements that do not involve
> back-and-forth changes. 12 will be removed as it seems not absolutely
> necessary -- let the users do whatever they feel OK, even if it means
> make the throttling algorithms work in some suboptimal condition.
>
Thanks, much appreciated! I'll await this new series.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists