[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101213155451.GA1691@nowhere>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:54:56 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: "David S. Ahern" <daahern@...co.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Add reference timestamp to perf header
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:39:24AM -0700, David S. Ahern wrote:
>
>
> On 12/12/10 13:16, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> >> int perf_session__create_kernel_maps(struct perf_session *self)
> >> {
> >> int ret = machine__create_kernel_maps(&self->host_machine);
> >> @@ -167,6 +190,9 @@ struct perf_session *perf_session__new(const char *filename, int mode, bool forc
> >> */
> >> if (perf_session__create_kernel_maps(self) < 0)
> >> goto out_delete;
> >> +
> >> + if (perf_session__create_ref_time(self) < 0)
> >> + goto out_delete;
> >
> > So, it does record it anytime?
>
> Simplest to always add it the header as it does no harm if not used. To
> make it conditional means adding an input parameter to
> perf_session__new() and then updating all the callers.
>
> Is the preference to make it conditional?
No, I suspect the overhead is plain unnoticeable. And if it becomes
any problem one day, we can still make that conditional later.
Thanks.
> David
>
>
> >
> >> }
> >>
> >> perf_session__update_sample_type(self);
> >
> >
> > Other than that, looks good!
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists