[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101213172908.GA27614@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:29:08 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, ak@...ux.intel.com,
mst@...hat.com, gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] [104/223] KVM: Write protect memory after
slot swap
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:08:11PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Wait, there's a 34-lt too?
>
> I'd like to have all stable kvms pass some minimum acceptance test,
> but that's quiet a lot of trees to maintain. Why do we have to have
> both 34-lt and 35-lt?
Because people are crazy :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists