[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101213201843.GA19409@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:18:43 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>
Cc: "gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] hv: Use only one receive buffer and kmalloc on
initialize
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 08:06:20PM +0000, Hank Janssen wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@...ah.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 11:41 AM
> > > The current versions of Hyper-V support interrupt handling on CPU0 only.
> > > I can make multiple buffers per channel, but because of Hyper-V
> > > implementation It does not really make a difference.
> >
> > Then put a big fat note in there saying this, and that it will have to change if
> > the hyperv channel ever changes.
> >
> > Hm, how will you handle things if the hyperv core changes and an old kernel
> > is running this code where things were "assumed" about the reentrancy
> > happening here?
>
> I will re-roll this patch to have a buffer per channel. It is a more elegant design
> Even though Hyper-V behavior is not changing in Win8 for this.
Win8, fine, but what about Win9? :)
thanks for changing it.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists