[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8AFC7968D54FB448A30D8F38F259C5622C0BCB78@TK5EX14MBXC116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:07:46 +0000
From: Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
CC: "gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@...ell.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] hv: Use only one receive buffer per channel and
kmalloc on initialize
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesper Juhl [mailto:jj@...osbits.net]
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 12:48 PM
> You are leaking memory in the failure path. If for example one or two
> allocations succeed but one or two fail, then you'll leak the two successful
> allocations.
>
> I believe this should be
>
> if (!shut_txf_buf || !time_txf_buf || !hbeat_txf_buf) {
> printk(KERN_INFO
> "Unable to allocate memory for receive buffer\n");
> kfree(hbeat_txf_buf);
> kfree(time_txf_buf);
> kfree(shut_txf_buf);
> return -ENOMEM;
> ...
>
Oops, you are correct. Resubmitting the patch in a few minutes.
Hank.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists