linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 16/35] writeback: increase min pause time on concurrent dirtiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101214065133.GA6940@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:51:33 +0800
From:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	"Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/35] writeback: increase min pause time on concurrent
 dirtiers

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 02:23:31AM +0800, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:47:02 +0800, Wu Fengguang said:
> > Target for >60ms pause time when there are 100+ heavy dirtiers per bdi.
> > (will average around 100ms given 200ms max pause time)
> 
> > --- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c	2010-12-13 21:46:16.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c	2010-12-13 21:46:16.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -659,6 +659,27 @@ static unsigned long max_pause(unsigned 
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > + * Scale up pause time for concurrent dirtiers in order to reduce CPU overheads.
> > + * But ensure reasonably large [min_pause, max_pause] range size, so that
> > + * nr_dirtied_pause (and hence future pause time) can stay reasonably stable.
> > + */
> > +static unsigned long min_pause(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> > +			       unsigned long max)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long hi = ilog2(bdi->write_bandwidth);
> > +	unsigned long lo = ilog2(bdi->throttle_bandwidth);
> > +	unsigned long t;
> > +
> > +	if (lo >= hi)
> > +		return 1;
> > +
> > +	/* (N * 10ms) on 2^N concurrent tasks */
> > +	t = (hi - lo) * (10 * HZ) / 1024;
> 
> Either I need more caffeine, or the comment doesn't match the code
> if HZ != 1000?

The "ms" in the comment may be confusing, but the pause time (t) is
measured in jiffies :)  Hope the below patch helps.

Thanks,
Fengguang
---
Subject: writeback: pause time is measured in jiffies
Date: Tue Dec 14 14:46:23 CST 2010

Add comments to make it clear.

Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
---
 mm/page-writeback.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c	2010-12-14 14:45:15.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c	2010-12-14 14:46:20.000000000 +0800
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ unlock:
  */
 static unsigned long max_pause(unsigned long bdi_thresh)
 {
-	unsigned long t;
+	unsigned long t;  /* jiffies */
 
 	/* 1ms for every 4MB */
 	t = bdi_thresh >> (32 - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT -
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ static unsigned long min_pause(struct ba
 {
 	unsigned long hi = ilog2(bdi->write_bandwidth);
 	unsigned long lo = ilog2(bdi->throttle_bandwidth);
-	unsigned long t;
+	unsigned long t;  /* jiffies */
 
 	if (lo >= hi)
 		return 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/