[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D0730A3.4080706@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:53:55 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Lyon <pugs@...co.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM & genirq: Enable adaptive IRQ sharing for
passed-through devices
On 12/14/2010 12:59 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Final but critical question: Who will pick up which bits?
>
The procedure which has served us well in the past is that tip picks up
the irq stuff and sticks them in a fast-forward-only branch; kvm merges
the branch and applies the kvm bits on top.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists