[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D073EAA.9080801@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:53:46 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
To: "Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>
CC: "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Drivers <Drivers@...log.com>,
"device-drivers-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org"
<device-drivers-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] IIO: Direct digital synthesis abi documentation
On 12/14/10 09:49, Hennerich, Michael wrote:
>> Jonathan Cameron wrote on 2010-12-13:
>> On 12/13/10 16:27, michael.hennerich@...log.com wrote:
>>> From: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>
>>>
>>> Changes since RFC/v1:
>>> IIO: Apply list review feedback:
>>>
>>> Apply list review feedback:
>>> Restructure documentation according to list feedback.
>>> Rename attributes to fit IIO convention used in other drivers.
>>> Fix typos.
>>> Provide ddsX_out_enable as opposed to ddsX_out_disable
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> This is more or less there. A few minor queries / suggestions
>> inline. The only major one is the mixture of X and [n] notation
>> for the various indicies. I 'think' all our docs have now moved
>> to the X notation. (if not then I have messed up!)
>>
>> I am happy with all the actual attributes. All remaining issues
>> are to do with the descriptions of what they do!
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
>>> ---
>>> .../staging/iio/Documentation/sysfs-bus-iio-dds | 94
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/staging/iio/Documentation/sysfs-bus-iio-
>> dds
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/Documentation/sysfs-bus-iio-dds
>> b/drivers/staging/iio/Documentation/sysfs-bus-iio-dds
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..6791174
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/Documentation/sysfs-bus-iio-dds
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
>>> +
>>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/device[n]/ddsX_freqY
>> We have a hybrid here of the old indexing schemed (device[n]) and the
>> new. Either just shorten then form to
>> /sys/bus/iio/.../ddsX_freqY or use
>> /sys/bus/iio/devices/deviceX/ddsY_freqZ and update below appropriately.
>>> +KernelVersion: 2.6.37
>>> +Contact: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
>>> +Description:
>>> + Stores frequency into tuning word register Y.
>> Technically it might not be a register? Dropping 'register' doesn't
>> to my mind change the meaning but makes it marginally more general.
>
> ok
>
>>> + There can be more than one ddsX_freqY file, which allows
>> for
>> If there is only one wouldn't it be ddsX_freq and correspond to direct
>> control rather than dependant on the tunning word?
>
> I don't understand. In case there is only one ddsX_freqY file.
> Then there is certainly no ddsX_freqsymbol or ddsX_pincontrol_freq_en file.
Then what is the Y index for? It's always 0 so why not suppress it and
just have ddsX_freq? Thus if there is a Y index there has to be more than 1.
>
>> The upshot of this
>> is that there are always 0 or more than 1 ddsX_freqY file.
>> Given we don't have any direct control cases yet that can be documented
>> when/if the turn up. Hence change line above to..
>> "There will be more than one ddsX_freqY file, which allows for"
>
> We can document the missing cases once we add parts that requires them.
>
>>> + pin controlled FSK Frequency Shift Keying
>>> + (ddsX_pincontrol_freq_en is active) or the user can control
>>> + the desired active tuning word by writing Y to the
>>> + ddsX_freqsymbol file.
>>> +
>>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/device[n]/ddsX_freqY_scale
>>> +KernelVersion: 2.6.37
>>> +Contact: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
>>> +Description:
>>> + Scale to be applied to ddsX_freqY in order to obtain the
>>> + desired value in Hz. If shared across all frequency
>> registers
>>> + Y is not present. It is also possible X is not present if
>>> + shared across all channels.
>>> +
>>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/device[n]/ddsX_freqsymbol
>>> +KernelVersion: 2.6.37
>>> +Contact: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
>>> +Description:
>>> + Specifies the active output frequency tuning word. The
>> value
>>> + corresponds to the Y in ddsX_freqY. To exit this mode the
>> user
>>> + can write ddsX_pincontrol_freq_en or ddsX_out_disable file.
>> Is it theoretically possible to read this value when pin control is on?
>
> Not with the AD9832/35 AD9833/34, some other DDS parts allow register readouts.
> Depending on the implementation of the device in question. It might be possible
> To read back the current hardware state.
>
> I'll add the read method.
>
>>> +
>>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/device[n]/ddsX_phaseY
>>> +KernelVersion: 2.6.37
>>> +Contact: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
>>> +Description:
>>> + Stores phase into phase register Y.
>> Again, the mention of 'register' is a bit leading. It's always a
>> register
>> so far but at least in theory it could be say several registers...
>
> I'll change.
>
>>> + There can be more than one ddsX_phaseY file, which allows
>> for
>> Again, 'There will be'
>
> ok
>
>>> + pin controlled PSK Phase Shift Keying
>>> + (ddsX_pincontrol_phase_en is active) or the user can
>>> + control the desired phase Y which is added to the phase
>>> + accumulator output by writing Y to the en_phase file.
>>> +
>>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/device[n]/ddsX_phaseY_scale
>>> +KernelVersion: 2.6.37
>>> +Contact: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
>>> +Description:
>>> + Scale to be applied to ddsX_phaseY in order to obtain the
>>> + desired value in rad. If shared across all phase registers
>>> + Y is not present. It is also possible X is not present if
>>> + shared across all channels.
>>> +
>>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/device[n]/ddsX_phasesymbol
>>> +KernelVersion: 2.6.37
>>> +Contact: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
>>> +Description:
>>> + Specifies the active phase Y which is added to the phase
>>> + accumulator output. The value corresponds to the Y in
>>> + ddsX_phaseY. To exit this mode the user can write
>>> + ddsX_pincontrol_phase_en or disable file.
>>> +
>>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/device[n]/ddsX_pincontrol_en
>>> +What:
>> /sys/bus/iio/devices/device[n]/ddsX_pincontrol_freq_en
>>> +What:
>> /sys/bus/iio/devices/device[n]/ddsX_pincontrol_phase_en
>>> +KernelVersion: 2.6.37
>>> +Contact: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
>>> +Description:
>>> + ddsX_pincontrol_en: Both, the active frequency and phase is
>>> + controlled by the respective phase and frequency control
>> inputs.
>>> + In case the device in question allows to independent
>> controls,
>>> + then there are dedicated files (ddsX_pincontrol_freq_en,
>>> + ddsX_pincontrol_phase_en).
>>> +
>>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/device[n]/ddsX_out_enable
>>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/device[n]/ddsX_outY_enable
>>> +KernelVersion: 2.6.37
>>> +Contact: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
>>> +Description:
>>> + ddsX_out_enable: Enables signal generation on all outputs
>>> + of channel X.
>>> + ddsX_outY_enable: Enables signal generation on output Y,
>>> + of channel X.
>> This description takes a rather different form from similar ones above.
>> Perhaps it should read...
>>
>> ddsX_outY_enable controls signal generation on output Y of channel X. Y
>> may
>> be suppressed if all channels are controlled together.
>>
>> (we can add supression of X to the description if it ever occurs!)
>
> ok
>
>>> +
>>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/device[n]/ddsX_outY_wavetype
>>> +KernelVersion: 2.6.37
>>> +Contact: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
>>> +Description:
>>> + Specifies the output waveform.
>>> + (sine, triangle, ramp, square, ...)
>>> + For a list of available output waveform options read
>>> + available_output_modes.
>>> +
>>> +What:
>> /sys/bus/iio/devices/device[n]/ddsX_outY_wavetype_available
>>> +KernelVersion: 2.6.37
>>> +Contact: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
>>> +Description:
>>> + Lists all available output waveform options.
>>> --
>>> 1.6.0.2
>>>
>>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists