[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101214155310.GA11400@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:53:10 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Daisuke HATAYAMA <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 3/21] Make vma_dump_size() generic
Suzuki, I didn't read this series. Still I have some concerns after
the very brief look...
On 12/14, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>
> @@ -114,10 +113,18 @@ unsigned long vma_dump_size(struct vm_ar
> * Switch to the user "segment" for get_user(),
> * then put back what elf_core_dump() had in place.
> */
> - set_fs(USER_DS);
> - if (unlikely(get_user(word, header)))
> - word = 0;
> - set_fs(fs);
> + if (p->group_leader == current->group_leader) {
same_thread_group() ?
> + mm_segment_t fs = get_fs();
> + set_fs(USER_DS);
> + if (unlikely(get_user(word, header)))
> + word = 0;
> + set_fs(fs);
> + } else {
> + int bytes = access_process_vm(p, (unsigned long)header,
> + &word, sizeof (word), 0);
Well. This adds a little pessimization. It is possible that the
"normal" coredump dumps the CLONE_VM process which doesn't below
to current's thread group.
May be you can compare ->mm's, but I am not sure.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists