[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101214160421.GD11400@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:04:21 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Daisuke HATAYAMA <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 11/21] Track the core generation requests
On 12/14, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>
> Concurrent core generation requests
> for the same target process are not allowed.
OK, but
> +static struct core_proc* get_core_proc(struct task_struct *t)
> +{
> + struct core_proc *cp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(cp, &core_list, list) {
> + if (cp->task == t->group_leader)
> + return cp;
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> ...
> static int open_gencore(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> {
> - return 0;
> + struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(inode);
> + struct core_proc *cp;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!task)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&core_mutex);
> + cp = get_core_proc(task);
> + if (cp) {
> + ret = -EALREADY;
I don't think this can work.
The task can change ->group_leader. This means 2 or more
open_gencore() can succeed if this task execs in between.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists