[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=wBLRLpGw+DUHTNwdFPOTkkTRwMQ17agVY1UVV@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:19:56 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Daisuke HATAYAMA <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Patch 0/21] Non disruptive application core dump infrastructure
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> I think a better way would be adding a ptrace attach which is nestable
> and doesn't have the nasty side effect caused by the interactions
> between the implicit SIGSTOP and group stop.
Don't we already nest at least to some degree? At least you can strace
a gdb session or another strace, no?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists