[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1d3p486qe.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:00:41 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@...il.com>
Cc: Christian Brandt <brandtc@...5.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: swap storage alignment and stride size
>>>>> "Ric" == Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@...il.com> writes:
Sorry, I've been away for a couple of weeks.
Ric> There has been a lot of work on alignment, Martin Petersen lead
Ric> most of that and is probably the best one to ping.
With modern tooling we should align the partition or DM device correctly
so the swap starts on a properly aligned boundary. But I don't think
anybody has looked into hooking the swap stuff up with the I/O
topology. I'm also not sure the swap code is flexible enough to deal
with units that are bigger than page size.
Hugh?
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists