[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101214125143.0ab00c97.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:51:43 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: stefani@...bold.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cramfs: generate unique inode number for better inode
cache usage
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:48:42 +0100
stefani@...bold.net wrote:
> This patch generates a unique inode numbers for any entries in the cram file
> system. For files which did not contain data's (device nodes, fifos and
> sockets) the offset of the directory entry inside + 1 will be used as the
> inode number.
>
> The + 1 for the inode will it make possible to distinguish between
> a file which contains no data and files which has data, the later one has
> a inode value where the lower two bits are always 0.
>
> It also reimplement the behavoir to set the size and the number of block
> to 0 for special file, which is the right value for devices, fifos and
> sockets.
>
> As a little benefit it will be also more compatible which older
> mkcramfs, because it will never use the cramfs_inode->offset for
> creating a inode number for special files.
Did you look at using iunique() to generate cramfs inode numbers?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists