linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: allow mtd and jffs2 when ARCH=um

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTim2i5e=5uioB8TQhpP9U9ZzSg=zLaH_xscP2Wmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:12:28 +0100
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	dedekind1@...il.com
Cc:	Jason Lunz <lunz@....org>,
	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	atom ota <atomota@...epyhammer.com>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: allow mtd and jffs2 when ARCH=um

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 21:01, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 11:51 -0800, Jason Lunz wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 06:24:38PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>> > But I think your solution is a bit dirty, because it adds a great deal
>> > of little 'if HAS_IOMEM' and '#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM' to many places.
>> > This is error-prone.
>>
>> The intent of that patch was to allow as much of the mtd subsystem to
>> compile as possible. My thinking was to try and rectify the fact that
>> uml has gone without mtd (and hence jffs2) support for years even though
>> much of it works just fine. I think the entire subsystem being marked
>> BROKEN in kconfig kept anyone from experimenting with it.
>>
>> The patch I sent was actually a reaction to feedback I got from Sam
>> Ravnborg on my last attempt (um, three years ago :/ ) in which he
>> suggested pushing down the ifdefs closer to their points of use. But I
>> agree, the minimal version has a much smaller footprint.
>>
>> The version below still meets the goal of allowing jffs2-on-block2mtd
>> usage under uml but is much smaller because only the mtd core is
>> included. Compile-tested on i386, x86_64, um/i386, and um/x86_64.
>>
>> > Instead, you should solve this problem in UML code. I do not know how,
>> > but may be you can add readb/writeb there which actually do nothing or
>> > print a scary warning, or do BUG(), and let things which use them just
>> > fail run-time.
>>
>> Something like this could work, but it would be error-prone for anyone
>> else who attempts using iomem-requiring drivers on uml. Instead of
>> getting obvious compile failures we'd have broken drivers that BUG() or
>> emit scary warnings. That doesn't seem to me like an improvement.
>
> This problem does not seem to be mtd-specific, right? So my point was
> that it would be nicer to come up with a general solution.

The generic solution for stuff that needs I/O operations is to mark it
"depends on HAS_IOMEM".

I used a similar patch in the past, IIRC to try axfs on UML.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/