[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1292368606.5015.1822.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:16:46 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: multiple candidate owners without unrelated
boosting
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 17:04 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> /* Release the task */
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
> + if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
> + /*
> + * the lock is free and has waiters, set the top waiter
> + * as a new candidate owner when it is not set.
> + */
> + if (top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
> + top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
> + top_waiter->cand_seq = lock->cand_seq;
Shouldn't this be:
top_waiter->cand_seq = ++lock->cand_seq;
?
-- Steve
> + if (!top_waiter->cand_owner) {
> + top_waiter->cand_owner = 1;
> + wake_up_process(top_waiter->task);
> + }
> + }
> + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
> + goto out_put_task;
> + }
> put_task_struct(task);
>
> /* Grab the next task */
> @@ -296,78 +303,16 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists