linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] PM: Remove redundant checks from core device resume routines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTikT-8XjqBfSPAVRZRKp5BQq_D8DeUo2YN3c4ntF@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:12:49 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] PM: Remove redundant checks from core device
 resume routines

2010/12/15 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>:
> On Tuesday, December 14, 2010, Ming Lei wrote:

>> Seems it may apply in other cases(dpm_prepare/dpm_suspend
>> /dpm_suspend_noirq) too?
>
> I thought about that, but in these cases the status is changed after the
> callback has returned and only if it's succeeded.  Moreover, if the callback
> hasn't been successful, the device is not moved to the new list, so I think
> it's better to leave that as is.

Yes, you are right, sorry for my noise, :-(


thanks,
-- 
Lei Ming
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/