[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1292425318.5015.1892.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:01:58 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtmutex: ensure only the top waiter or higher priority
task can take the lock and reduce unrelated boosting
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 15:52 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> RT itself will stress test the rtmutex code as much as it goes as we
> convert almost every lock into a rtmutex there.
>
> Steven, could you have a look at that ?
>
Yep, I'll look to porting it today.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists