[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D08EDA9.3090801@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:32:41 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [cpuops cmpxchg V2 3/5] irq_work: Use per cpu atomics instead
of regular atomics
On 12/14/2010 05:28 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> The irq work queue is a per cpu object and it is sufficient for
> synchronization if per cpu atomics are used. Doing so simplifies
> the code and reduces the overhead of the code.
>
> Before:
>
> christoph@...ux-2.6$ size kernel/irq_work.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 451 8 1 460 1cc kernel/irq_work.o
>
> After:
>
> christoph@...ux-2.6$ size kernel/irq_work.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 438 8 1 447 1bf kernel/irq_work.o
>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Peter, can you please ack this one?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists