[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101215164316.GA5641@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:43:16 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
To: Dave Martin <dave.martin@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with the arm-current
tree
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:28:39PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:54:35AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Russell,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the arm tree got a conflict in
> >> arch/arm/Kconfig between commit 6e6fc998b8c127fe06b9350a1f16e41bfe4f109d
> >> ("ARM: 6533/1: Thumb-2: Make CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL depend on !CPU_V6")
> >> from the arm-current tree and commit
> >> 4a50bfe365a977f634311504484342fbfffe855c ("ARM: Ensure experimental
> >> options are so marked") from the arm tree.
> >>
> >> Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> >> necessary.
> >
> > Yea, rather unfortunate. I'll fix it up locally once arm-current is
> > merged into mainline.
>
> Looks like this was a case of two simple changes on neighbouring lines
> -- I'll try to avoid such conflicts for the future.
It's not a problem.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists