linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/10] gpio: sx150x: irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D091DD2.3070300@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:58:10 -0800
From:	Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@...eaurora.org>
To:	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
CC:	Gregory Bean <gbean@...eaurora.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] gpio: sx150x: irq_data conversion.

On 12/13/2010 4:03 AM, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek<buytenh@...retlab.ca>
Tested-by: Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>   drivers/gpio/sx150x.c |   46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>   1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/sx150x.c b/drivers/gpio/sx150x.c
> index 823559a..e60be00 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/sx150x.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/sx150x.c
> @@ -304,36 +304,36 @@ static int sx150x_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
>   	return chip->irq_base + offset;
>   }
>
> -static void sx150x_irq_mask(unsigned int irq)
> +static void sx150x_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
>   {
> -	struct irq_chip *ic = get_irq_chip(irq);
> +	struct irq_chip *ic = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
>   	struct sx150x_chip *chip;
>   	unsigned n;
>
>   	chip = container_of(ic, struct sx150x_chip, irq_chip);
> -	n = irq - chip->irq_base;
> +	n = d->irq - chip->irq_base;
>
>   	sx150x_write_cfg(chip, n, 1, chip->dev_cfg->reg_irq_mask, 1);
>   	sx150x_write_cfg(chip, n, 2, chip->dev_cfg->reg_sense, 0);
>   }
>
> -static void sx150x_irq_unmask(unsigned int irq)
> +static void sx150x_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
>   {
> -	struct irq_chip *ic = get_irq_chip(irq);
> +	struct irq_chip *ic = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
>   	struct sx150x_chip *chip;
>   	unsigned n;
>
>   	chip = container_of(ic, struct sx150x_chip, irq_chip);
> -	n = irq - chip->irq_base;
> +	n = d->irq - chip->irq_base;
>
>   	sx150x_write_cfg(chip, n, 1, chip->dev_cfg->reg_irq_mask, 0);
>   	sx150x_write_cfg(chip, n, 2, chip->dev_cfg->reg_sense,
>   			 chip->irq_sense>>  (n * 2));
>   }
>
> -static int sx150x_irq_set_type(unsigned int irq, unsigned int flow_type)
> +static int sx150x_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int flow_type)
>   {
> -	struct irq_chip *ic = get_irq_chip(irq);
> +	struct irq_chip *ic = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
>   	struct sx150x_chip *chip;
>   	unsigned n, val = 0;
>
> @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static int sx150x_irq_set_type(unsigned int irq, unsigned int flow_type)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>
>   	chip = container_of(ic, struct sx150x_chip, irq_chip);
> -	n = irq - chip->irq_base;
> +	n = d->irq - chip->irq_base;
>
>   	if (flow_type&  IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
>   		val |= 0x1;
> @@ -386,9 +386,9 @@ static irqreturn_t sx150x_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
>   	return (nhandled>  0 ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE);
>   }
>
> -static void sx150x_irq_bus_lock(unsigned int irq)
> +static void sx150x_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *d)
>   {
> -	struct irq_chip *ic = get_irq_chip(irq);
> +	struct irq_chip *ic = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
>   	struct sx150x_chip *chip;
>
>   	chip = container_of(ic, struct sx150x_chip, irq_chip);
> @@ -396,9 +396,9 @@ static void sx150x_irq_bus_lock(unsigned int irq)
>   	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
>   }
>
> -static void sx150x_irq_bus_sync_unlock(unsigned int irq)
> +static void sx150x_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *d)
>   {
> -	struct irq_chip *ic = get_irq_chip(irq);
> +	struct irq_chip *ic = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
>   	struct sx150x_chip *chip;
>   	unsigned n;
>
> @@ -437,16 +437,16 @@ static void sx150x_init_chip(struct sx150x_chip *chip,
>   	if (pdata->oscio_is_gpo)
>   		++chip->gpio_chip.ngpio;
>
> -	chip->irq_chip.name            = client->name;
> -	chip->irq_chip.mask            = sx150x_irq_mask;
> -	chip->irq_chip.unmask          = sx150x_irq_unmask;
> -	chip->irq_chip.set_type        = sx150x_irq_set_type;
> -	chip->irq_chip.bus_lock        = sx150x_irq_bus_lock;
> -	chip->irq_chip.bus_sync_unlock = sx150x_irq_bus_sync_unlock;
> -	chip->irq_summary              = -1;
> -	chip->irq_base                 = -1;
> -	chip->irq_sense                = 0;
> -	chip->irq_set_type_pending     = 0;
> +	chip->irq_chip.name                = client->name;
> +	chip->irq_chip.irq_mask            = sx150x_irq_mask;
> +	chip->irq_chip.irq_unmask          = sx150x_irq_unmask;
> +	chip->irq_chip.irq_set_type        = sx150x_irq_set_type;
> +	chip->irq_chip.irq_bus_lock        = sx150x_irq_bus_lock;
> +	chip->irq_chip.irq_bus_sync_unlock = sx150x_irq_bus_sync_unlock;
> +	chip->irq_summary                  = -1;
> +	chip->irq_base                     = -1;
> +	chip->irq_sense                    = 0;
> +	chip->irq_set_type_pending         = 0;
>   }
>
>   static int sx150x_init_io(struct sx150x_chip *chip, u8 base, u16 cfg)


Thanks,
Rohit Vaswani

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/