[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D081BF2.7000202@euromail.se>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:37:54 +0100
From: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
To: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Chris Bagwell <chris@...bagwell.com>,
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Alternative approach to MT_TOOL_ENVELOPE
Hi Chase,
>
> I gave this some more thought, and I was close to accepting it with
> documentation of the above restrictions. Then I thought of how the
> following two devices would be presented to userspace:
>
> 1. A real MT device supporting up to 2 touches (e.g. a bamboo touch)
> - ABS_{X,Y}, BTN_TOUCH, BTN_TOOL_FINGER, and BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP for ST
> - ABS_MT_SLOT, ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID, ABS_MT_POSITION_{X,Y}, ABS_MT_TOOL_TYPE
>
> 2. A partial MT device using MT_TOOL_ENVELOPE (e.g. synaptics MT)
> - ABS_{X,Y}, BTN_TOUCH, BTN_TOOL_FINGER, and BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP for ST
> - ABS_MT_SLOT, ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID, ABS_MT_POSITION_{X,Y}, ABS_MT_TOOL_TYPE
>
> Note that they are identical! The range of values for each axis would be
> identical too. The only way to tell the two apart would be to watch for
> the ABS_MT_TOOL_TYPE axis.
Ping has touched upon this subject as well, from the pen & touch perspective.
Generally, some ABS axes are actually enumerations, for which we have no direct
abstraction. If we had a way to declare the used values for such enumerations,
it would resolve these and possibly other issues.
Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists