[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D092D15.7030700@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:03:17 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Pekka Enbeerg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: x86: A fast way to check capabilities of the current cpu
On 12/15/2010 12:56 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:07:39 -0600 (CST)
> Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
>
>> +#define cpu_has(c, bit) \
>> + (__builtin_constant_p(bit) && REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 1 : \
>> test_cpu_cap(c, bit))
>>
>> +#define this_cpu_has(bit) \
>> + (__builtin_constant_p(bit) && REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 1 : \
>> + this_cpu_test_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&cpu_info.x86_capability))
>> +
>
> Isn't
>
> a ? 1 : b
>
> a complex way of writing
>
> a || b
>
Not if b is not a bool.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists