[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1292447255-10698-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:07:33 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jaxboe@...ionio.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: vgoyal@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] blk-throttle: Couple of more fixes
Hi Jens,
Please find attached couple of more fixes for blk-throttle code. These are
based on top of "for-linus" branch of your block tree.
Oleg had pointed out couple of race conditions in cgroup weight update code.
I think these race conditions are hard to hit and not disastrous so I would
not be too concerned about pushing these patches in 2.6.37 and can queue
up for 2.6.38.
Paul,
Based on discussion in other mail thread, I have used xchg() based
implementation for updating and processing limtis. Can you please have a look
if it is correct implementation and do I need any ACCESS_ONCE() or barriers
somewhere. If this implementation is not correct then I can go back to atomic
variable based implementation as suggested by you in other mail thread.
Appreciate the help.
Thanks
Vivek
Vivek Goyal (2):
blk-throttle: process limit change only through one function
blk-throttle: Some cleanups and race fixes in limit update code
block/blk-throttle.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists