[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1292492842.3019.5.camel@wall-e>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:47:22 +0100
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cramfs: generate unique inode number for better inode
cache usage
Am Mittwoch, den 15.12.2010, 08:45 -0800 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:31 AM, <stefani@...bold.net> wrote:
> >
> > Pekka's approach is not problem. But the "cruddy" CRAMINO_UNIQ() is exact
> > what is needed. In your orginal design of cramfs there is no way to give
> > entries with no data an unique inode number.
>
> Umm. And my cramino() did exactly that. If it has a data pointer, it
> uses that, otherwise it uses the directory offset.
>
The current implementation does it not.
> It just doesn't care about the mode of the file.
>
Right, but there are a buggy cramfs tools (which can create images for
different endian target or create on the fly devices nodes and so on)
out there, which set the offset of the cramfs_inode to a value not equal
0. This works well with older kernel like 2.6.12 but during the
evolution of the kernel this was broken.
I will resend a cleaned up patch. Hope you will apply it ;-)
Stefani
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists