[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D0A2B6C.1000400@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:08:28 -0500
From: Stephen Caudle <scaudle@...eaurora.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: dwalker@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
adharmap@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
miltonm@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [ARM] gic: Unmask private interrupts on all cores
during IRQ enable
On 12/16/2010 10:03 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> I've not changed my thoughts on this. PPIs should not be handled by
> genirq - it just doesn't make sense for them to be.
Understood. I will work on a patch to perf events to support the MSM
performance monitor PPI on SMP.
~Stephen
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists