[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D0A799F.4060408@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:42:07 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [cpuops cmpxchg V2 5/5] cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid
lock semantics
On 12/16/2010 08:14 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hey, again.
>
> On 12/15/2010 05:39 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> I'd prefer percpu things going through percpu tree, if for nothing
>> else for git history's sake, but I don't think it really matters. The
>> series is spread all over the place anyway. As long as each
>> maintainer is properly alerted about the changes, it should be okay.
>> Please let me know whether you agree with the changes currently queued
>> in percpu#for-next. I'll update the tree with your Acked-by's and
>> freeze it.
>
> Are you okay with the patches currently in percpu#for-next? If so,
> I'll regenerate patches with your acked-by and pop the two previously
> mentioned commits and proceed with the rest of the series.
>
Just finished reviewing the patches in percpu#for-next.
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Look good. Let me know when you have a baseline I can pull into a tip
branch so we can build the rest of the patches on top.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists