[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D0B400D.8010903@siemens.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:48:45 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Tom Lyon <pugs@...co.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] genirq: Inform handler about line sharing state
Am 17.12.2010 11:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 17.12.2010 11:23, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> OTOH, if we have to disable anyway, then we could simply keep it
>>> disabled across the installation of a new handler. That would make the
>>> notification business go away, wouldn't it ?
>>
>> No, the notification is still necessary in case the registered handler
>> keeps the line off after returning from both hard and threaded handler.
>
> And how should that happen? If it is in oneshot mode then the line is
> reenabled when the thread handler returns.
disable_irq_nosync is called by the handler before returning. And it's
the handler's job to revert this, properly synchronizing it internally.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists