[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1PTcau-0001aw-60@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:51:44 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add replace_page_cache_page() function
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> No. memory cgroup expects all pages should be found on LRU. But, IIUC,
> pages on this radix-tree will not be on LRU. So, memory cgroup can't find
> it at destroying cgroup and can't reduce "usage" of resource to be 0.
> This makes rmdir() returns -EBUSY.
Oh, right. Yes, the page will be on the LRU (it needs to be,
otherwise the VM coulnd't reclaim it). After the
add_to_page_cache_locked is this:
if (!(buf->flags & PIPE_BUF_FLAG_LRU))
lru_cache_add_file(newpage);
It will add the page to the LRU, unless it's already on it.
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists