[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D0BB9AD.90506@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:27:41 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>,
"linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>,
Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86, acpi: Parse all SRAT cpu entries even have
cpu num limitation
On 12/17/2010 10:53 AM, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> linus git + these two patches still fails on my test system with the
> divide error. The failure dump is similar to what I reported here
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail//linux/kernel/1012.1/03641.html
>
> This patch description talk about new Intel systems. The test system I
> am seeing failure here is an ancient Intel (2 socket P4 HT) system.
> AFAICS, it does not even have an SRAT table (no "ACPI: SRAT" message
> in dmesg).
that could be different cause.
Do you have whole boot log with debug etc?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists