[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101217205433.GA10199@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:54:33 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/20] second preview of RCU patches for 2.6.38
Hello!
This patchset contains RCU priority boosting for the tiny RCU
implementations and a number of fixes and cleanups. The patches
are as follows, with the first 12 being updates from the earlier
posting at https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/6/187:
1. Add rcutorture tests to check for correct priority boosting.
2-6. RCU priority boosting for the tiny RCU implementations.
RCU priority boosting for the tree RCU implementations is
in progress, but not yet ready for prime time.
7. Fix a few naming holdouts from old Classic RCU.
8. Move synchronize_sched_expedited() out of sched.c
(from Lai Jiangshan).
9. Simplify the RCU callback orphan/adopt code for CPU hotplug
(from Lai Jiangshan).
10. Update RCU tracing documentation to reflect patch #9.
11. Fix a race condition in synchronize_sched_expedited(),
but Tejun Heo has suggested another approach that might
be better longer term.
12. Make synchronize_srcu_expedited() spin for a bit to avoid
blocking -- again, there may be a better long-term fix.
That said, this adaptive approach seems to work very well
in practice.
13. Improve synchronize_sched_expedited()'s ability to batch
concurrent requests, as foreshadowed above.
14-15. Make RCU avoid looking for quiescent states in cases when
they are not required, thereby improving RCU's energy
efficiency (from Frederic Weisbecker).
16. Enlist the rnp->qsmask data to simplify #14 and #15 and
also handle another case where RCU was unnecessarily asking
CPUs to go through quiescent states.
17. Limit tree RCU's leaf-level fanout to reduce lock contention.
Lock contention is higher at the leaf level that elsewhere
in the tree of rcu_node structures due to the fact that
CPUs synchronize at the leaf level to detect grace-period
events.
18. Reduce tree RCU's leaf-level lock contention still further
by making __call_rcu() less aggressive about starting new
grace periods. The aggression is a holdover from ancient
times predating synchronize_rcu_expedited().
19. Fix a mismatched-parentheses error in __list_for_each_rcu()
(from Mariusz Kozlowski).
20. Given that there are no in-tree users, remove the aforementioned
__list_for_each_rcu(). This is maintained as a separate
commit in case there is a use out there somewhere making its
way into mainline. (Though I would rather keep this API
out -- list_for_each_entry_rcu() is much better in most cases.)
For a testing-only version of this patchset from git, please see:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-2.6-rcu.git rcu/testing
Thanx, Paul
Documentation/RCU/trace.txt | 12 -
b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt | 132 +++++++++++-
b/include/linux/init_task.h | 9
b/include/linux/rculist.h | 2
b/include/linux/rcupdate.h | 1
b/include/linux/rcutiny.h | 8
b/include/linux/rcutree.h | 1
b/include/linux/sched.h | 11 -
b/init/Kconfig | 39 +++
b/kernel/rcutiny.c | 71 +++++-
b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h | 15 -
b/kernel/rcutorture.c | 270 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
b/kernel/rcutree.c | 81 +------
b/kernel/rcutree.h | 16 -
b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 71 ++++++
b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c | 8
b/kernel/sched.c | 69 ------
b/kernel/srcu.c | 8
include/linux/rculist.h | 5
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 3
include/linux/rcutiny.h | 5
include/linux/rcutree.h | 1
init/Kconfig | 16 +
kernel/rcutiny.c | 70 ++----
kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h | 444 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/rcutree.c | 95 ++++++--
kernel/rcutree.h | 45 ++--
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 110 +++++++---
kernel/rcutree_trace.c | 4
29 files changed, 1272 insertions(+), 350 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists