[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101217155531.89efe13f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:55:31 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] delay.h: add __must_check to msleep_interruptible
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:49:47 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:55:41 +0200
> Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il> wrote:
>
> > Code calling msleep_interruptible() must be aware that sleep time might be
> > shorter than intended as a result of a signal being caught. Code not checking
> > the return value of msleep_interruptible() is probably buggy, unless it's doing
> > the signal_pending() check itself, which is redundant.
> >
>
> True. But there are around 250 callsites which don't check the
> msleep_interruptible() return value.
One quick way of fixing this would be to add
/*
* Used by callsites which are supposed to be calling msleep_interruptible(),
* but which were failing to properly handle msleep_interruptible()'s return
* value
*/
static inline void msleep_you_suck_fixme_please(unsigned int msecs)
{
msleep(msecs);
}
and then patch all the offending msleep_interruptible() callsites to
use msleep_you_suck_fixme_please(). Then add the __must_check to
msleep_interruptible().
And note that 250 msleep_interruptible() -> msleep() changes will
probably fix lots of bugs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists