[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1012161804280.4484@tigran.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:10:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add replace_page_cache_page() function
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > I disagree with you there: I like the way Miklos made it symmetric,
> > I like the way delete_from_swap_cache drops the swap cache reference,
> > I dislike the way remove_from_page_cache does not - I did once try to
> > change that, but did a bad job, messed up reiserfs or reiser4 I forget
> > which, retreated in shame.
>
> I agree symmetric is good. I just said current fact which is that
> remove_from_page_cache doesn't release ref.
> So I thought we have to match current semantic to protect confusing.
> Okay. I will not oppose current semantics.
> Instead of it, please add it (ex, caller should hold the page
> reference) in function description.
>
> I am happy to hear that you tried it.
> Although it is hard, I think it's very valuable thing.
> Could you give me hint to googling your effort and why it is failed?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/24/140
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists